This article compares the size of Wikipedia with other encyclopedias and information collections. Source material from which Wikipedia statistics in this article are derived is available here; the Footnote on WikiStatistics section at the end of this page provides technical discussion of this article.
Nevertheless, there are many other online databases which combine several encyclopedias and encyclopedic dictionaries and allowing users to search all of the works simultaneously. One example is Oxford Reference Online — a combined database of 160 encyclopedias and encyclopedic dictionaries, offering a total of 940,000 articles as of 2006, with expansions planned for the future.[1] Another example is Xrefplus, which offers access to 262 encyclopedias, dictionaries, and other reference books.[2] This all added up to about 2.9 million entries when the database had 225 titles.[3] There also is HighBeam Research and GaleNet. GaleNet — which is likely the largest named so far — offers users the ability to search several encyclopedia databases, including the Biography Resource Center (1,335,000 people), Gale Virtual Reference Library (594 reference books),[4] and the Science Resource Center (58 titles),[5] among others. The largest encyclopedia ever produced is possibly the Yongle Encyclopedia, completed in 1407 in 11,095 books, 370 million Chinese characters. These books were small by modern standards; the work was twelve times the size of the 20 million word French Encyclopédie,[6] giving a total of 240 million words, or 21,600 words per book, although it is unclear if that is how it differs from the Encyclopédie in size. It is also unclear if it is twelve times larger than the original 28-volume version of the Encyclopédie completed in 1772 or the 35-volume version completed in 1780. The Yung-lo ta-tien was a collection of excerpts and entire existing works, rather than an original work. Only two copies were made and all that survives is a small fraction of one copy. In 2005 the English-language Wikipedia more than doubled in size, and many smaller wikipedias have grown by a higher multiple. There have been 282,885 contributors to all Wikipedia language editions (151,937 to the English language edition), with 8.2 million edits in September 2006 (3.8 million of which were in the English version). Wikipedia is still in need of much expansion and improvement. Many of the articles are of poor quality and some mainstream encyclopedia topics are not covered adequately. And, the average article length is only a little over half the size of that in Encyclopædia Britannica. Over time the balance of the editorial effort is expected to slowly tilt towards a greater emphasis on increasing the quality, scope, classification and interlinkage of existing articles. However new articles will probably always be created in large numbers, as Wikipedia's conventions on acceptable article topics incorporate huge numbers of potential new articles every year (newly prominent people, current events, media products, physical products etc). In mid 2006 the rate of new article creation was still rising, but only slowly. As of January 2007 it looks like the rate of article creation may have peaked in mid 2006, though it would be premature to state that it did so for certain. [edit] Comparison of encyclopediasNumbers regarding total characters are based on an estimated average word length of five, plus a space, or six characters per word. On September 1, 2006, the English Wikipedia had 1.4 million articles1 and 609 million words, giving a mean article length of 435 words and over three and a half billion total characters. It also had about 850,000 photographs and illustrations, 1.4 million redirect pages, over 2.6 million links to other websites and a staggering 32.1 million cross reference links between articles.
*Classical Chinese is a very compact language. The result is very short in size for the same content. †It is said that Yongle is larger than Siku, but it is uncertain how they were compared. ‡Kenneth F. Kister, Kister's best encyclopedias: a comparative guide to general and specialized encyclopedias, (1994) p. 450. [Article count is for the 82-volume edition, rather than the 119-volume one.] §Alfieri, G. Treccani Degli. "Enciclopedia italiana" Diccionario Literario (2001 HORA, S.A.) **Number of encyclopedic articles. The Nationalencyklopedin contains a total of 356,000 entries. ††Kister, op. cit., p. 365. **Includes 10,000 historical archives. ‡‡Advertised as containing "over 63,000 articles...with 36,000-plus map locations, and over 29,000 editor-approved Web site links." The 2006 Premium CD-ROM had 68,000 articles.[12] ⁑Advertised as containing 41,500 articles written by 6,803 authors, 60 million of words, 350 million of characters, 360,000 links, 122,000 definitions in the included dictionary, 130,000 bibliographical references, 2008 Press release. [edit] Size of other information collectionsNote that Wikipedia is neither a dictionary nor a web index; these figures are just for order-of-magnitude comparison.
[edit] Larger numbers
[edit] Footnote on Wikipedia statisticsVery detailed statistics for almost all aspects of Wikipedia are available from http://www.wikipedia.org/wikistats/EN/Sitemap.htm. Statistics for this page are taken from the Article count (alternate) table and from the Words table. Excluding redirect pages, there are roughly (using figures from September 1, 2006):
Taking the difference of these two figures, there are about:
There is also an uncounted number of articles which have no links. The current statistics provide no indication of the size of this last category. The upshot is that the 609 million words in fact span the 1.3 million bona fide articles, the remaining 100,000 linked articles, and the unknown number of articles without links. A rough estimate of the word count in the latter two categories is ten million words. Dividing the remaining 600 million words by 1.3 million gives a mean article length of about 460 words. Further, of the articles on the English Wikipedia, perhaps 36,000 are "data dumped" gazetteer entries about towns and cities in the United States. It is controversial whether gazetteer entries should count towards the number of "real" encyclopedia articles; however, their statistical significance is very much less now than in October 2002 when they were added. Very many have been colonised by Wikipedians who have transformed them to varying extents, including to an unimpeachably encyclopedic status. [edit] References
[edit] See also
Directorio de Enlaces Directorio dmoz Directorio espejo dmoz Pedro Bernardo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||