Indexed family

El directorio enciclopédico desde la Wikipedia.

In mathematics, an indexed family of sets is defined in stages, beginning with the more general concept of an indexed family of elements, which an alternative way of conceptualizing the range of a function or mapping.

First, a mapping f from a set J to a set X is alternatively conceptualized as a family of elements of X indexed by J. In this usage, J is called the index set of the family f : J → X, the functional image f(j) for j ∈ J is denoted x_j, and the mapping f is denoted {x_j}_j∈J or simply {x_j}.

Next, if the set X is the power set of a set U, then the family {x_j}_j∈J is called a family of sets indexed by J .

1 Mathematical statement
2 Examples
- 2.1 Index notation
- 2.2 Matrices
3 Functions, sets and families
4 Examples
5 Operations on families
6 Subfamily
7 Usage in category theory
8 References
9 See also

[edit] Mathematical statement

Definition. Let X and I be any sets. Then by family of elements in X indexed by I , we mean a function $x : I \mapsto X$ . An indexed family is denoted by $\{ x_i \}_{i \in I}$ , where it is understood that there is a function x that maps i to $x_i := x(i) \,$ .

An indexed family can be turned into a set by considering the set $\mathcal{X} := \{ x_i : i \in I \}$ , that is, the range of x, but this will collapse the elements $x i = x j$ with $i \neq j$ into elements in $\mathcal{X}$ .

Definition. Let S be a set. An indexed family of sets $\{ C_i \}_{i \in I}$ is an indexed family that maps I to elements of the power set of S.

Hence, an indexed family of sets is conceptually different from a family of sets (which is just a synomym of "set of sets"), but is practice the distinction is sometimes fuzzy and the indexed family is identified with is range and treated like a ordinary family.

[edit] Examples

[edit] Index notation

Whenever index notation is used the indexed objects form a family. For example, consider the following sentence.

The vectors v₁, …, v_n are linearly independent.

Here (v_i)_{i ∈ {1, …, n}} denotes a family of vectors. The i-th vector v_i only makes sense with respect to this family, as sets are unordered and there is no i-th vector of a set. Furthermore, linear independence is only defined as the property of a collection; it therefore is important if those vectors are linearly independent as a set or as a family.

If we consider n = 2 and v₁ = v₂ = (1, 0), the set of them consists of only one element and is linearly independent, but the family contains the same element twice and is linearly dependent.

[edit] Matrices

Suppose a text states the following:

A matrix A is invertible, if and only if the rows of A are linearly independent.

As in the previous example it is important that the rows of A are linearly independent as a family, not as a set. For, consider the matrix

$A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix} .$

The set of rows only consists of a single element (1, 1) and is linearly independent, but the matrix is not invertible. The family of rows contains two elements and is linearly dependent. The statement is therefore correct if it refers to the family of rows, but wrong if it refers to the set of rows.

[edit] Functions, sets and families

There is a one-to-one correspondence between surjective functions and families, as any function f with domain I induces a family (f(i))_i∈I. But, unlike a function, a family is viewed as a collection and being an element of a family is equivalent with being in the range of the corresponding function. A family contains any element exactly once, if and only if the corresponding function is injective.

Like a set, a family is a container and any set X gives rise to a family (x)_x∈X. Thus any set naturally becomes a family. For any family (A_i)_i∈I there is the set of all elements {A_i | i∈I}, but this does not carry any information on multiple containment or the structure of I. Hence, by using a set instead of the family, some information might be lost.

[edit] Examples

Let n be the finite set {1, 2, …, n}, where n is a positive integer.

An ordered pair is a family indexed by the two element set 2 = {1, 2}.
An n-tuple is a family indexed by n.
An infinite sequence is a family indexed by the natural numbers.
A list is an n-tuple for an unspecified n, or an infinite sequence.
An n×m matrix is a family indexed by the cartesian product n×m.
A net is a family indexed by a directed set.

[edit] Operations on families

Index sets are often used in sums and other similar operations. For example, if (a_i)_i∈I is a family of numbers, the sum of all those numbers is denoted by

$\sum_{i\in I}a_i.$

When (A_i)_i∈I is a family of sets, the union of all those sets is denoted by

$\bigcup_{i\in I}A_i.$

Likewise for intersections and cartesian products.

[edit] Subfamily

A family (B_i)_i∈J is a subfamily of a family (A_i)_i∈I, if and only if J is a subset of I and for all i in J

B_i = A_i

[edit] Usage in category theory

Main article: Diagram (category theory)

The analogous concept in category theory is called a diagram. A diagram is a functor giving rise to an indexed family of objects in a category C, indexed by another category J, and related by morphisms depending on two indices.

[edit] References

Mathematical Society of Japan, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Mathematics, 2nd edition, 2 vols., Kiyosi Itô (ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993. Cited as EDM (volume).

[edit] See also

Página espejo de la Wikipedia

Directorio de Enlaces Directorio dmoz Directorio espejo dmoz Pedro Bernardo

Indexed family

El directorio enciclopédico desde la Wikipedia.

Contents

[edit] Mathematical statement

[edit] Examples

[edit] Index notation

[edit] Matrices

[edit] Functions, sets and families

[edit] Examples

[edit] Operations on families

[edit] Subfamily

[edit] Usage in category theory

[edit] References

[edit] See also