Christianity does not have a clear position regarding slavery, in favour or against. As a religion, it neither promotes slavery nor condemns it. In the early years of Christianity, slavery was a normal feature of the economy and society in the Roman Empire and well into the Middle Ages and beyond. Well into the modern era, groups who advocated abolition of slavery invoked Christian teachings in support of their positions, and those opposed to abolition invoked their own interpretation of Christian teachings in support of their positions.
[edit] Early attitudes
The early Christian perspectives of slavery were formed in the contexts of Christianity's roots in Judaism, and as part of the wider culture of the Roman Empire. Both the Old and New Testaments recognise the institution of slavery. The earliest surviving teachings about slavery are from Paul the Apostle, who frequently referred to himself as a "Slave of Christ." Paul did not renounce the institution of slavery; conversely, he taught that Christian slaves ought to serve their masters wholeheartedly (Ephesians 6:5-8). At the same time, he taught slave owners to treat their slaves fairly. The entire epistle of Philemon is devoted to Onesimus, a runaway slave and convert whom Paul returns to his master, to be seen as "not just a slave, but much more than a slave; he is a dear brother in Christ."(verse 16) Within the church itself, Paul called for a desegregation of the congregations in verses such as Galatians 3:28, ("there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female; for ye are all one in Christ Jesus"). Perhaps Paul's strongest language appears in a letter to his protégé in 1 Timothy 1:8-11, which places the slave trade in a list among other cruel and inhuman sins. [1] Paul's letters formed a large part of the Christian canon, although Christians would disagree over the issue of slavery for centuries. In Christian cemeteries, when slaves were buried, the grave seldom included any indication that the person buried had been a slave.[citation needed] Christianity recognised marriage of sorts among slaves.[2] Freeing slaves was regarded as an act of charity.[citation needed] Christianity rarely criticised the actual "institution" of slavery. Slaves who fled from their masters were, at some times and places in history, condemned with anathema and refused Eucharistic communion.[3] [edit] Serfdom replaces slaveryThe barbarian invasions in the early Middle Ages vastly increased the number of slaves, both through capture and through people accepting a servile state in return for protection.[4] As Europe emerged from the early Middle Ages, slavery was transformed into the institution of serfdom[5], which, instead of bonding a serf to a particular owner, bonded them to the land. While slaves could be bought and sold by themselves, serfs could not be forced to leave their land, although if the landlord sold the land, the serfs would be sold with it. [edit] Christianity's changing viewSince the Middle Ages, the Christian understanding of slavery has seen significant internal conflict and endured dramatic change. Nearly all Christian leaders before the late 17th century recorded slavery, within specific Biblical limitations, as consistent with Christian theology. But today, nearly all modern Christians are united in the condemnation of slavery as wrong and contrary to God's will. [edit] Christian advocacy of slaveryThroughout history, passages in the Old Testament of the Bible have been used as justification of the keeping of slaves, and for guidance in how it should be done. Therefore, when abolition was proposed, many Christians spoke vociferously against it, citing the Bible's apparent acceptance of slavery as 'proof' that it was part of the normal condition. In both Europe and the United States, many Christians went further, and argued that slavery was actually justified by the words and doctrines of the Bible.
And some members of fringe Christian groups like the Christian Reconstructionists, the Christian Identity movement, and the Ku Klux Klan (an organization dedicated to the "empowerment of the white race"), still argue that slavery is justified by Christian doctrine today. [edit] Enslaving of non-Christians by Christians
Christians regularly kept non-Christian slaves up until the abolition of slavery in general. Views on slavery of non-Christians, however, varied from place to place and person to person. Saint Patrick (415-493), himself a former slave, argued for the abolition of slavery. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) believed that slavery was "morally justifiable". It is said the Teutonic Order opposed strongly the conversion of Lithuania into Christianity in the 14th century, since it meant the end of lucrative slave trading of captured Lithuanians to Tatars. Pope Eugenius IV forbade to take indigenous inhabitants of the Canary Islands to slavery. In 1452 Pope Nicholas V, in his Dum Diversas, instituted the hereditary enslavement of "nonbelievers". In 1488, Pope Innocent VIII accepted the gift of 100 slaves from Ferdinand II of Aragon, and distributed those slaves to his cardinals and the Roman nobility;[6] In 1639 Pope Urban VIII forbade the slavery of the Indians of Brazil, Paraguay, and the West Indies, yet he purchased non-Indian slaves for himself from the Knights of Malta;[7] [edit] Enslaving of ChristiansThe nearly universal consensus throughout the ages has been that Christians must not keep other Christians as slaves[citation needed]. Paul's epistle to Philemon urges Philemon to take Onesimus, a stealing slave who fled from Philemon but who was converted by Paul, as a brother, not as a slave.
The Christianization of Europe in the Dark Ages saw the traditional slavery disappearing in Europe and being replaced with feudalism[citation needed]. But this consensus was broken in the slave states of the United States, where the justification switched from religion ('the slaves are heathens') to race ('Africans are the descendants of Ham'). The opposition to the U.S. Civil Rights movement in the 20th century was founded in part on the same religious ideas that had been used to justify slavery in the 19th century. [edit] Christian abolitionismThroughout Europe and the United States, Christians from 'un-institutional' movements, not directly connected with state or church power, were to be found at the forefront of the abolitionist movements. Many of the early campaigners for the abolition of slavery were driven by a Christian faith, and a desire to see the theoretical Christian view, that all people are equal, made a practical reality. Prominent among these was William Wilberforce. In Britain and America Quakers were active in abolitionist movements. Disagreements between the newer way of thinking and the old often created schisms within denominations at the time. [edit] Catholic opposition to slaveryIn 1435 Pope Eugene IV condemned slavery, of other Christians, in Sicut Dudum [1]. In 1462 Pope Pius II declared slavery to be a "great crime" (magnum scelus);[8]. In 1537 Pope Paul III condemned it in Sublimus Dei [2]; In 1741 Pope Benedict XIV condemned slavery generally; in 1815 Pope Pius VII demanded of the Congress of Vienna the suppression of the slave trade; in the Bull of Canonization of the Jesuit Peter Claver, one of the most illustrious adversaries of slavery, Pope Pius IX branded the "supreme villainy" (summum nefas) of the slave traders;[8] in 1839 Pope Gregory XVI condemned slavery in In Supremo Apostolatus [3]; and in 1888 Pope Leo XIII in In Plurimis [4]. See also The Final Abolition of Slavery in Christian Lands for a full time line. [edit] History[edit] In the Roman EmpirePresent-day Christians argue that Paul and Peter were not defending or condoning slavery, but simply they recognized it as a fact of life in the Roman Empire. Paul was not a social reformer, but an apostle who was more concerned with the spiritual condition of men and women than he was with their physical circumstances. Paul, while in prison, himself addressed the spiritual attitudes of believers, in order so that people would ultimately find slavery repugnant, by virtue of their relationship with Christ. In the Epistle to Philemon Paul appeals to Philemon's commitment to Christ: "If thou count me therefore a partner, receive him (Onesimus) as myself"[9] and "even though I do not say to you how you yourself owe me your own self besides [10]. Of course, the letter is accompanying a runaway slave being returned to his master; and the letter to the Ephesians contains the famous admonition: "Slaves! be obedient to them that are your masters, according to the flesh, in fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ" [11] which specifically compares that relationship with the relationship between a believer and a deity, and indeed, "endorses" slavery[12]. [edit] Curse of HamSee Curse of Ham The Judeo-Christian narrative from Genesis 9:20-27, provided one of the "moral pretext" upon which the Atlantic slave trade grew and flourished. According to Jewish Talmud scholars, and then later other religious groups, Ham was the progenitor of the African race and subsequent translations were stirred to reflect the biases and prejudice of the era. The most profound manifestation occurred in imagery, which constantly portrayed white as God, and black as the Devil. Many pre-modern Christian scholars and sources provide a wealth of data on the subject of the connection between the curse of Ham, race and slavery: Origen (circa 185-c. 254): “For the Egyptians are prone to a degenerate life and quickly sink to every slavery of the vices. Look at the origin of the race and you will discover that their father Cham, who had laughed at his father’s nakedness, deserved a judgment of this kind, that his son Chanaan should be a servant to his brothers, in which case the condition of bondage would prove the wickedness of his conduct. Not without merit, therefore, does the discolored posterity imitate the ignobility of the race [Non ergo immerito ignobilitatem decolor posteritas imitatur].” Homilies on Genesis 16.1 “Mar Ephrem the Syrian said: When Noah awoke and was told what Canaan did. . .Noah said, ‘Cursed be Canaan and may God make his face black,’ and immediately the face of Canaan changed; so did of his father Ham, and their white faces became black and dark and their color changed.” Paul de Lagarde, Materialien zur Kritik und Geschichte des Pentateuchs (Leipzig, 1867), part II St. Jerome: “Chus in Hebrew means Ethiopian, that is, black and dark, one who has a soul as black as his body.” (The Homilies of Saint Jerome, vol. 1, trans. Marie Liguori Ewald, Homily 3, 28). St. Paulinus of Nola (354-431): “The peoples of Ethiopia...are black with vice, sin giving them the color of night.” Carmina 28.249-51 The Eastern Christian work, the Cave of Treasures (4th century), explicitly connects slavery with dark-skinned people: “When Noah awoke. . .he cursed him and said: ‘Cursed be Ham and may he be slave to his brothers’. . .and he became a slave, he and his lineage, namely the Egyptians, the Abyssinians, and the Indians. Indeed, Ham lost all sense of shame and he became black and was called shameless all the days of his life, forever.” La caverne des trésors: version Géorgienne, ed. Ciala Kourcikidzé, trans. Jean-Pierre Mahé, Corpus scriptorium Christianorum orientalium 526-27, Scriptores Iberici 23-24 (Louvain, 1992-93), ch. 21, 38-39 (translation). John Philoponus, Greek Christian philosopher (6th century): “The Scythians and Ethiopians are distinguished from each other by black and white color, or by long and snubbed nose, or by slave and master, by ruler and ruled,” and again, “The Ethiopian and Scythian. . .one is black, the other white; similarly slave and master.” A. Sanda, Oposcula Monophysitica Johannes Philoponi (Beirut, 1930), pp. 66,96 (Sanda’s Latin translation). Ishodad of Merv (Syrian Christian bishop of Hedhatha, 9th century): When Noah cursed Canaan, “instantly, by the force of the curse. . .his face and entire body became black [ukmotha]. This is the black color which has persisted in his descendents.” C. Van Den Eynde, Corpus scriptorium Christianorum orientalium 156, Scriptores Syri 75 (Louvain, 1955), p. 139. Eutychius, Alexandrian Melkite patriarch (d. 940): “Cursed be Ham and may he be a servant to his brothers… He himself and his descendants, who are the Egyptians, the Negroes, the Ethiopians and (it is said) the Barbari.” Patrologiae cursus completes…series Graeca, ed. J.P. Migne (Paris, 1857-66), Pococke’s (1658-59) translation of the Annales, 111.917B (sec. 41-43) Ibn al-Tayyib (Arabic Christian scholar, Baghdad, d. 1043): “The curse of Noah affected the posterity of Canaan who were killed by Joshua son of Nun. At the moment of the curse, Canaan’s body became black and the blackness spread out among them.” Joannes C.J. Sanders, Commentaire sur la Genèse, Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium 274-275, Scriptores Arabici 24-25 (Louvain, 1967), 1:56 (text), 2:52-55 (translation). Bar Hebraeus (Syrian Christian scholar, 1226-86): “‘And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father and showed [it] to his two brothers.’ That is…that Canaan was cursed and not Ham, and with the very curse he became black and the blackness was transmitted to his descendents…. And he said, ‘Cursed be Canaan! A servant of servants shall he be to his brothers.’” Sprengling and Graham, Barhebraeus’ Scholia on the Old Testament, pp. 40-41, to Gen 9:22. [edit] Slavery in the AmericasIn introduction of Catholic Spanish colonies to the Americas brought forced conversions and slavery to the indigenous peoples living there. Some priests, such as Father Bartolomé de las Casas worked to protect Americans from slavery, although Casas works may have helped to inspire the African slave trade. Although many abolitionists opposed slavery on purely philosophical reasons, anti-slavery movements attracted strong religious elements. Notable Christian abolitionists include William Wilberforce in England, and Henry Ward Beecher in the United States. A more radical abolitionist, John Brown, was considered to have been either a martyr or a zealot, depending on one's point of view. [edit] Christianity and Indigenous African ReligionsSlavery witnessed the lack of synchronization of Christian belief with Folk religion of African origin . African-American slaves did not have any organized spirituality other than what they were taught. Slavery in the United States devastated traditional culture and religion among Africans. Slaves in the eighteenth century came from various African societies, cultures and nations, such as the Ibo, Ashanti and Yoruba on the West African Coast. Consequently, slaves from differing ethnic groups displayed little commonalities. Africans were black, but did not experience a homogenous existence they shared little of their traditional cultures and religions. Slaveholders and whites feared individual and group consciousness. Traditional African beliefs, cultures, and religions, were suppressed to prohibit cultural unity among slaves. It was the practice of ‘Divide and Rule’. Ibo, Yoruba, and Ashanti religions did not survive the Middle Passage. The Institution of slavery, and the influx of forced Christian conversions, eliminated traditional African religions in the United States. No Ibo, Ashanti, or Yoruba traditional culture and religion survived. [edit] United StatesOpposition to slavery in the United States predates the nation's independence. As early as 1688, congregations of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) actively protested slavery. The Quaker Testimony of Equality would have an influence on slavery in Pennsylvania. The rise of abolitionism in nineteenth century politics was mirrored in religious debate; slavery among Christians was generally dependent on the attitudes of the community the lived in. This was true in Protestant and Catholic churches.[13] Religious integrity affected the white slave-holding Christian population. The Bible was manipulated to support the institution of slavery and its inhumane practices. Crimes such as murder were justifiable if it was inflicted upon African-Americans. Christianity was used to suppress and conform a people. Slaveholders, priests, and those tied to the Church undermined the beliefs of the millions of African-American converts. The issue of slavery in the United States came to a conclusion with the American Civil War. Although the war began as a political struggle over the preservation of the nation, it took on religious overtones as southern preachers called for a defense of their homeland and northern abolitionists preached the good news of liberation for slaves. Gerrit Smith and William Lloyd Garrison abandoned pacifism, and Garrison changed the motto of The Liberator to Leviticus 25:10, "Proclaim Liberty throughout all the land, and to all the inhabitants thereof." The YMCA joined with other societies to found the United States Christian Commission, with the goal of supporting Union soldiers, and churches collected $6 million for their cause.[14] Harriet Tubman, considered by many to be a prophet due to her success as a liberator with the Underground Railroad, warned "God won't let master Lincoln beat the South till he does the right thing" by emancipating slaves. Popular songs such as John Brown's Body (later The Battle Hymn of the Republic) contained verses which painted the northern war effort as a religious struggle to end slavery. Even Abraham Lincoln appealed to religious sentiments, suggesting in various speeches that God had brought on the war as punishment for slavery,[15] while acknowledging in his Inaugural Address that both sides "read the same Bible, and pray to the same God; and each invokes His aid against the other." With the Union victory in the war and a constitutional ban on slavery, abolitionist Christians also declared a religious victory over their slave-holding brethren in the South. Southern religious leaders who had preached a message of divine protection were now left to reconsider their theology. [edit] BaptistsBy the 1830s, tension had began to mount between Northern and Southern Baptist churches. The support of Baptists in the South for slavery can be ascribed to economic and social reasons. However, Baptists in the North claimed that God would not "condone treating one race as superior to another". Southerners, on the other hand, held that God intended the races to be separate. Finally, around 1835, Southern states began complaining that they were being slighted in the allocation of funds for missionary work. The break was triggered in 1844, when the Home Mission Society announced that a person could not be a missionary and still keep his slaves as property. Faced with this challenge, the Baptists in the south assembled in May 1845 in Augusta, Georgia, and organized the Southern Baptist Convention. [edit] MethodismMethodists believed that the institution of slavery contradicted their strict morality and abolitionist principles. Methodists were long at the forefront of slavery opposition movements. The Christian denomination attempted to help slaves and subsequently freed blacks through philanthropic agencies such as the American Colonization Society and the Mission to the Slaves. It was during the 1780s that American Methodist preachers and religious leaders formally denounced African-American Slavery. The founder of Methodism, the Anglican priest John Wesley, believed that “slavery was one of the greatest evils that a Christian should fight”. Eighteenth and early nineteenth century Methodists had anti-slavery sentiments, as well as the moral responsibility to bring an end to African-American Slavery. Following Emancipation, African-Americans believed that true freedom was to be found through the communal and nurturing aspects of the Church. The Methodist Church was at the forefront of freed-slave agency in the South. Denominations into the southern states included the African Methodist Episcopal (AME) and African Methodist Episcopal Zion (AMEZ) churches. These institutions were led by blacks that explicitly resisted white charity, believing it would have displayed white supremacy to the black congregations. The AME, AMEZ, and African-American churches throughout the South provided social services such as ordained marriages, baptisms, funerals, communal support, and educational services. Education was highly regarded. Methodists taught former slaves how to read and write, consequently enriching a literate African-American society. Blacks were instructed through Biblical stories and passages. Church buildings became schoolhouses, and funds were raised for teachers and students. [edit] Mormonism
Mormon scripture condemns slavery, teaching "it is not right that any man should be in bondage one to another."(D&C 101:80) The Book of Mormon heralds righteous kings who did not allow slavery, (Mosiah 29:40) and righteous men who fought against slavery.(Alma 48:11) The Book of Mormon also describes an ideal society instituted by Jesus Christ, in which the people "had all things common among them; therefore there were not rich and poor, bond and free, but they were all made free, and partakers of the heavenly gift."(4 Nephi 4:3) Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism, issued a number of statements stating the church's position regarding slavery and the abolitionist movement. Concerning American slavery, Smith said "it makes my blood boil within me to reflect upon the injustice, cruelty, and oppression of the rulers of the people,"[16] but preached the importance of upholding the law of the land,[17] which included the institution of slavery. Instead, he proposed a gradual end to slavery by the year 1850 by buying slaves from their slave holders. He argued that blacks should then be given equal employment opportunities as whites.[18] He believed that given equal chances as whites, blacks would be like whites.[19] In his personal journal, he wrote that the slaves owned by Mormons should be brought "into a free country and set ... free—Educate them and give them equal rights."[20] Later in his life, living in Illinois and running for the presidency of the United States, Smith wrote a political platform containing a plan to abolish slavery.[18] [edit] Biblical references[edit] Old TestamentThe Hebrew Bible is neutral on the institution of slavery: it does not promote slavery, but it only condemns it in the case of racial slavery, such as when the Hebrews were slaves in Egypt.[21] A Jew was obligated to free a Jewish slave after six years of servitude (Exodus 21:2-6), while non-Jewish slaves could be slaves for life (Leviticus 25:44-46). Biblical figures who kept slaves included the patriarchs Abraham and Isaac, Boaz (from the Ruth story) and King Solomon. Other figures mentioned in the New Testament include Cornelius and Philemon. Slaves mentioned in the Bible include Hagar, Sarah's hand-maid who was used by her as a surrogate mother, and Eliezer of Damascus, who was in charge of Abraham's household and charged with finding a bride for Isaac. Also, Bilhah is described as Rachael's handmaid and Zilpah as Leah's handmaid, both of whom are given to Jacob (also known as Israel) as concubines and whose children with him rank equally with those of Rachael and Leah. There is also the story of the sale of Joseph by his brothers for twenty pieces of silver (Genesis 37:25-28) and the enslavement of the Hebrews in Egypt and their liberation by the hand of God in the Exodus, led by Moses, who was himself born a Hebrew slave. [edit] New Testament[edit] Christian slaves enjoined to obedience
[edit] Spiritual slaveryChristian writers from Biblical times onwards have used the image of the slave to represent the Christian spiritual view. In many Christian views all people are 'slaves to sin'; they are unable to free themselves from a way of life where they do evil. However God 'redeems' those whom He calls; they are "bought with a price", removing them from the control of sin and become God's "slaves", who then loves and protects them.
The Holy Spirit:
[edit] Against the keeping of slaves[edit] Old TestamentAgainst forced Hebrew enslavement:
Against returning escaped slaves:
Against a specific incident by foreigners enslaving and selling Hebrews:
[edit] Apostle Paul on slavery in the Roman EmpireSlaves should "not care" for their slavery, but seek freedom if lawfully possible:
Christianity makes no distinctions in the worthiness of all Christians, including slaves:
[edit] References
[edit] External links
Directorio de Enlaces Directorio dmoz Directorio espejo dmoz Pedro Bernardo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||